[ Autonomous offensive security ]
An autonomous security researcher for the software you ship. It learns the boundaries your product trusts, crosses the ones that should not hold, and proves every finding with hard evidence.
01 / The gap
Scanners match payloads against a checklist. Pentests are a snapshot that ages the moment they end. Meanwhile your app ships new logic every day, and the boundaries that quietly stop trusting the wrong request are the ones nobody tests.
UnboundCompute reasons about your application, not a generic list, so it finds the crossing that matters and shows you it is real.
02 / Evidence
No guessing at severity, no "likely exploitable." Each report is a recorded request, the response that should never have come back, and a replay your engineers can run themselves.
03 / What it crosses
Six classes it reasons through, not a signature it matches.
Acting as another tenant, owner, or role, and getting a 200 that proves it.
Walking identifiers to read or mutate records that belong to someone else.
Refunds, discounts, quotas and workflows bent past what the rules intend.
Privilege escalation, token confusion, and flows that forget to check again.
Coaxing the backend into reaching places the boundary assumed it could not.
Climbing from a low-trust caller to actions only an admin should reach.
04 / Why it's different
Scanners
Match known payloads against a checklist. Loud, generic, and blind to logic that is unique to you. You triage the noise.
Manual pentest
Deep but a snapshot. Expensive, scheduled, and stale the day after it ends, while your app keeps shipping.
UnboundCompute
Reasons about your app continuously, crosses only the boundaries that should hold, and proves each one with replayable evidence.
Request access
UnboundCompute is in private access. Point it at a staging environment and see what it proves before your next release does.
or explore the console demo with sample data